Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Gender-Biased Sex Selection in South Korea, India and Vietnam [electronic resource] : Assessing the Influence of Public Policy / by Laura Rahm.

By: Rahm, Laura [author.]Contributor(s): SpringerLink (Online service)Material type: TextTextSeries: Demographic Transformation and Socio-Economic Development ; 11Publisher: Cham : Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Springer, 2020Edition: 1st ed. 2020Description: XXVI, 340 p. 53 illus. online resourceContent type: text Media type: computer Carrier type: online resourceISBN: 9783030202347Subject(s): Demography | Economic development | Social change | Population | Sociology | Asia—Politics and government | Demography | Development and Social Change | Population Economics | Gender Studies | Asian PoliticsAdditional physical formats: Printed edition:: No title; Printed edition:: No title; Printed edition:: No titleDDC classification: 304.6 LOC classification: HB848-3697Online resources: Click here to access online
Contents:
1. Gender-Biased Sex Selection in Asia: Motives, Methods, Magnitudes -- 2. History and Theory of Public Policies against Sex Selection -- 3. Methodology -- 4. South Korea -- 5. India -- 6. Vietnam -- 7. Cross-Country Comparison: Policies, Patterns and Processes -- 8. General Conclusion: Limited Evidence that Policies Normalize SRB.
In: Springer Nature eBookSummary: This book provides an in-depth analysis of the influence of public policy on sex selection. Three Asian countries were chosen for the comparative policy analysis, namely South Korea, India and Vietnam that share in common a historical legacy of son preference, high levels of sex imbalances and active policy response to curbing the growing demographic masculinization of their nations. The research based on the data collected from field work in the three countries shows that despite the adoption of very similar anti-sex selection policies the outcomes have been markedly different for each of the three countries. These unexpected diverse outcomes are explained partly by their different historical and cultural contexts, and partly to the different social, political and economic institutions and dynamics. This monograph offers careful and detailed explanations of both within and across country diversities in policy outcomes, pointing to the importance and the limits of cross-national policy learning and adoption, and raising questions about the efficacy of international organizations’ current approaches to global policy and knowledge transfer.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

1. Gender-Biased Sex Selection in Asia: Motives, Methods, Magnitudes -- 2. History and Theory of Public Policies against Sex Selection -- 3. Methodology -- 4. South Korea -- 5. India -- 6. Vietnam -- 7. Cross-Country Comparison: Policies, Patterns and Processes -- 8. General Conclusion: Limited Evidence that Policies Normalize SRB.

This book provides an in-depth analysis of the influence of public policy on sex selection. Three Asian countries were chosen for the comparative policy analysis, namely South Korea, India and Vietnam that share in common a historical legacy of son preference, high levels of sex imbalances and active policy response to curbing the growing demographic masculinization of their nations. The research based on the data collected from field work in the three countries shows that despite the adoption of very similar anti-sex selection policies the outcomes have been markedly different for each of the three countries. These unexpected diverse outcomes are explained partly by their different historical and cultural contexts, and partly to the different social, political and economic institutions and dynamics. This monograph offers careful and detailed explanations of both within and across country diversities in policy outcomes, pointing to the importance and the limits of cross-national policy learning and adoption, and raising questions about the efficacy of international organizations’ current approaches to global policy and knowledge transfer.